Top, from left: John Rausch, Alysha Nishikawa, Jose Antonio Colina, Sandra Jones. Bottom, from left: Jitu Brown, Mariam Zaiat, Bill Campbell. (Daniel Heyman, Scott McIntyre, Joyce Koh, Adeshina Emmanuel, Trevor Bach, Allyson Crowell/For The Washington Post)

In the past three weeks, President Trump has bombed Syria, hosted his first state dinner, signaled that he’s open to brokering a new deal to constrain Iran’s nuclear weapons program and explored rejoining a trade deal with Pacific Rim countries that he pulled out of last year. He has praised North Korea’s leader as “very honorable” for considering negotiations, and he appeared to take some credit Friday for the “historic meeting” between the leaders of North and South Korea.

This nontraditional president frequently sums up his approach to foreign policy with two words: “America first.”

That philosophy has meant tweeted attacks on fellow world leaders, efforts to dramatically reduce the number of refugees allowed into the United States, threats of tariffs and deep cuts to the State Department’s budget. But Trump has also made a string of decisions that seem to conflict with his “America first” agenda, often at the urging of his Cabinet members or fellow Republicans who worry about the United States preserving its alliances and upholding its position in the world.

As part of The Washington Post’s Of America series, we dispatched seven reporters across the country to ask what “America first” really means — and what role the United States should play in the world.

Has Trump changed America’s role in the world?

Republican Americans reflect on the role America should play on the world stage and whether President Trump has helped or hurt the country’s reputation.